
By writing this post, I admit culpability.
The charge? Indifference. Evidenced by inaction.
I've grown up watching a genocide & until recently didn't realize how strange that is. Its always been easy to scoff at the Americans of the past, who waited far too long before stopping the holocaust. It seems so obvious that had we been alive then, the response would have been so much quicker and focused. Yet, Sudan has opened up like a wound before the world's eyes. And no one is moving to stop the bleeding.
Perhaps there is (was) very little that I could have done to stop this event from happening. Honestly, what was happening wasn't even on my radar until summer of 2007 when I was studying in Strasbourg, France.
What is condemning is that this is a genocide that I, and people my age, have grown up with. It has been with us during our formative years. If you mention Darfur, most people my age have a clear understanding that something very ugly happened there. Many will be able to tell you the nation has witnessed a genocide. And many others in my generation will be able to identify the ethno/religious roots of the aggression. We are not uninformed. Ignorance does not excuse our lack of movement. Nor the stillness of our hearts.
I read a piece by Richard Just* on The New Republic's online version a few weeks ago. The quote below made me feel absolutely sick to my stomach:
"[T]his gives Darfur a morbid sort of distinction. No genocide has ever been so thoroughly documented while it was taking place. There were certainly no independent film-makers in Auschwitz in 1942, and the best-known Holocaust memoirs did not achieve a wide audience until years after the war. The world more or less looked the other way as genocide unfolded in Cambodia during the 1970s, and the slaughter in Rwanda happened so quickly--a mere hundred days--that by the time the public grasped the extent of the horror, the killing was done. But here is Darfur, whose torments are known to all. The sheer volume of historical, anthropological, and narrative detail available to the public about the genocide is staggering. In the case of the genocide in Darfur, ignorance has never been possible. But the genocide continues. We document what we do not stop. The truth does not set anybody free."
Richard Just,
The Truth Will Not Set You Free, The New Republic, http://www.tnr.com/story_print.html?id=36975a7c-224c-438a-9538-130b9e5cdd91 (accessed August 15, 2009).
I heard a homily at Redeemer Presbyterian in Newport Beach, CA in the fall of 2007 about poverty and wealth. Part of the pastor's thoughts included the observation our age is increasingly complicated due to the availability of information. Today we are a mouse-click away from witnessing the most degrading poverty in the world via our computers screens and internet accessibility. Google images can take you to the slums in moments. How much more indifferent we will likely become than generation before. We are on track to becoming one of the least empathic generations in history.
Overexposed in every way. Bombarded. Able to change the channel quickly. Autonomous. Overfed. Under-read.
There is just so much that we have to dull, shut-out, in order to continue our own lives. That is because a crisis like Darfur demands urgent action. Even by a college student who was saving up for a motorcycle. And while Darfur is certainly the most gruesome example at present, there are also atrocities taking the lives of the innocent throughout the globe: Zimbabwe, East Timor, North Korea, Tibet, Afghanistan, Burma, and on.
One other complication that arises when thinking about how to respond (or how we ought to have responded) to Darfur is the question: OK, now that we know what is happening how to stop it?
The activists have done a great job making documentaries or writing books. But their own assumptions about the use of force undermine their goals, Richard Just captures this reality as well:
" "Many of us peace and human rights advocates are rightly reluctant about the use of force. We need to get over it. There is such a thing as evil in this world, and sometimes the only way to confront evil is through the judicious use of military force." Amen, as long as "judicious" also means effective."
Id.
I had a similar reaction. Now, being a Calvinist, I'm not a pacifist. I'm entirely against violence--but I believe that the use of just force to protect the innocence is anything but violent. Yet, the notion of sending troops to Darfur was a difficult concept.
But to stop the killing, it is the only answer. Bush's dilemna was much like Clinton's at the time of Rwanda. Clinton was feeling too politically vulnerable after the failure in Somolia to sanction any type of action. Likewise, as the situation in Darfur worsened, Bush was bearing intense criticism for the conflict in Iraq. It would be easy to blame Bush, but the truth is that Germany, France, and China all had plenty of able bodied troops available, all of whom could have ended the killing. In fact, they still do.
And then there is President Obama. He is a President who wears the liberal mantle of idealism and respect for human rights. Further, he enjoys unprecedented popularity internationally. It would seem obvious that he would have already done something to intervene in this situation. Yet, nothing. Granted, he faces numerous challenges domestically, but really the priority of stopping the genocide and the delivery of Omar Bashir to the Hague, trump even the most serious domestic issues.
Simply, its time to move forward. We must immediately sign and ratify the Statute of Rome, adding to the strength of the International Criminal Court. Further, we must coordinate with China. China is the largest trading partner on the African continent. A coordinated action by these two governments would be a powerful movement. After all, the purposes of government, more than any other tasks, are to restrain evil and promote the good.
Most importantly, we need to push aside the asinine domestic debates, which define the political spectrum of the U.S. Its time to start fighting for things that matter, that is, innocent human beings. There are still many things which can and must be done to protect many people.
But nothing we do now can change who we are. A generation that grew up watching a genocide and did little. A generation that must trade indifference for guilt.
*Read that article
here